User login |
murmerkudos to the murmer project. I can also see the resemblance oral history project sponsored by the US through the WPA of the 1930's. I agree with Diedie in that I would like to hear more from the participant but I recognize that each technology (and busy people) have limitations. Maybe keeping you wanting more is a good thing! One key difference with the Oral History Project is that murmer not only does it take the microphone from the institution and puts it into the public's hand but it also takes the project to the streets. Hearing the stories in a location based environment allows for a unique deployment of locative media. This is not a knock on the Oral History Project, rather an attempt to point out that Murmer is different experience that listening to audio tapes in the library. |